13. Pro-sumti summary

The Lojban pro-sumti are the cmavo of selma'o KOhA. They fall into several classes: personal, definable, quantificational, reflexive, back-counting, indefinite, demonstrative, metalinguistic, relative, question. More details are given in Chapter 7; this section mostly duplicates information found there, but adds material on the implicit quantifier of each pro-sumti.

The following examples illustrate each of the classes. Unless otherwise noted below, the implicit quantification for pro-sumti is ``ro'' (all). In the case of pro-sumti which refer to other sumti, the ``ro'' signifies ``all of those referred to by the other sumti'': thus it is possible to restrict, but not to extend, the quantification of the other sumti.

Personal pro-sumti (``mi'', ``do'', ``mi'o'', ``mi'a'', ``ma'a'', ``do'o'', ``ko'') refer to the speaker or the listener or both, with or without third parties:

13.1)
    mi prami do
    I love you.
The personal pro-sumti may be interpreted in context as either representing individuals or masses, so the implicit quantifier may be ``pisu'o'' rather than ``ro'': in particular, ``mi'o'', ``mi'a'', ``ma'a'', and ``do'o'' specifically represent mass combinations of the individuals (you and I, I and others, you and I and others, you and others) that make them up.

Definable pro-sumti (``ko'a'', ``ko'e'', ``ko'i'', ``ko'o'', ``ko'u'', ``fo'a'', ``fo'e'', ``fo'i'', ``fo'o'', ``fo'u'') refer to whatever the speaker has explicitly made them refer to. This reference is accomplished with ``goi'' (of selma'o GOI), which means ``defined-as''.

13.2)
    le cribe goi ko'a cu xekri

cll/c6/s13.html










0
(No comment)



(Optional. Used to edit your comment. Please don't use anything important.)

.i ko'a citka le smacu
The bear defined-as it-1 is-black.
It-1 eats the mouse.

Quantificational pro-sumti (``da'', ``de'', ``di'') are used as
variables in bridi involving predicate logic:

13.3)
ro da poi prenu
cu prami pa de poi finpe
All somethings-1 which-are persons
love one something-2 which-is a-fish.
All persons love a fish (each his/her own).

(This is not the same as ``All persons love a certain fish'';
the difference between the two is one of quantifier order.) The
implicit quantification rules for quantificational pro-sumti
are particular to them, and are discussed in detail in href="../c16/s1.html">Chapter 16. Roughly speaking, the
quantifier is ``su'o'' (at least one) when the pro-sumti is
first used, and ``ro'' (all) thereafter.

Reflexive pro-sumti (``vo'a'', ``vo'e'', ``vo'i'', ``vo'o'',
``vo'u'') refer to the same referents as sumti filling other
places in the same bridi, with the effect that the same thing
is referred to twice:



13.4)
le cribe cu batci vo'a
The bear bites what-is-in-the-x1-place.
The bear bites itself.

Back-counting pro-sumti (``ri'', ``ra'', ``ru'') refer to the
referents of previous sumti counted backwards from the
pro-sumti:

13.5)
mi klama la frankfurt. ri
I go to-Frankfurt from-the-referent-of-the-last-sumti
I go from Frankfurt to Frankfurt (by some unstated route).

Indefinite pro-sumti (``zo'e'', ``zu'i'', ``zi'o'') refer to
something which is unspecified:

13.6)
mi klama la frankfurt. zo'e zo'e zo'e
I go to-Frankfurt from-unspecified via-unspecified
by-means-unspecified.

The implicit quantifier for indefinite pro-sumti is, well,
indefinite. It might be ``ro'' (all) or ``su'o'' (at least one)
or conceivably even ``no'' (none), though ``no'' would require
a very odd context indeed.

Demonstrative pro-sumti (``ti'', ``ta'', ``tu'') refer to
things pointed at by the speaker, or when pointing is not
possible, to things near or far from the speaker:



13.7)
ko muvgau ti ta tu
you [imperative] move this-thing from-that-nearby-place
to-that-further-away-place
Move this from there to over there!

Metalinguistic pro-sumti (``di'u'', ``de'u'', ``da'u'',
``di'e'', ``de'e'', ``da'e'', ``dei'', ``do'i'') refer to
spoken or written utterances, either preceding, following, or
the same as the current utterance.

13.8)
li re su'i re du li vo
0
(No comment)



(Optional. Used to edit your comment. Please don't use anything important.)

.i la'e di'u jetnu
The-number two plus two equals the-number four.
The-referent-of the-previous-utterance is-true.

The implicit quantifier for metalinguistic pro-sumti is
``su'o'' (at least one), because they are considered analogous
to ``lo'' descriptions: they refer to things which really are
previous, current, or following utterances.

The relative pro-sumti (``ke'a'') is used within relative
clauses (see Chapter 8 for a
discussion of relative clauses) to refer to whatever sumti the
relative clause is attached to.



13.9)
mi viska le mlatu ku
poi zo'e zbasu ke'a
loi slasi
I see the cat(s)
such-that something-unspecified makes it/them (the cats)
from-a-mass-of plastic.
I see the cat(s) made of plastic.

The question pro-sumti (``ma'') is used to ask questions which
request the listener to supply a sumti which will make the
question into a truth:

13.10) do klama ma
You go to-what-sumti?
Where are you going?

The implicit quantifier for the question pro-sumti is ``su'o''
(at least one), because the listener is only being asked to
supply a single answer, not all correct answers.

In addition, sequences of lerfu words (of selma'o BY and
related selma'o) can also be used as definable pro-sumti.