Posts and uploaded files are owned by the poster. jbotcan.org is not liable for the content submitted by the poster. Downloading any poster-submitted files is doing so at your own risk.
What does ".abu melbi" mean? Is ".abu" the beautiful letter of "a" or a beautiful non-letter?
Latter, due to http://dag.github.com/cll/17/9/If you want to say the former, you can always quote the lefru with {me'o}, as mentioned in http://dag.github.com/cll/17/10/:{me'o .abu [cu] melbi}
Latter, due to http://dag.github.com/cll/17/9/If you want to say the former, you can always quote the lefru with {me'o}, as mentioned in http://dag.github.com/cll/17/10/:
{me'o .abu [cu] melbi}
NB what {me'o} quotes {.abu} as a mex and makes it into a sumti representing that mex itself (as opposed to {li .abu}, which is a sumti representing the value of "a"), as described in http://dag.github.com/cll/18/19/So the literal meaning would be> "a" is the beautiful [mex]But http://dag.github.com/cll/17/10/ mentions that this will be interpreted as> "a" is the beautiful [letteral], as a special case.".abu", on the other hand, is not a letteral at all, but is a word. (Okay, it IS also the letteral, referenced by lerfu-string "denpa bu.abuby.ubu"). You can say ".abu is a beautiful [word]" quoting it with, for instance, {zo}.
NB what {me'o} quotes {.abu} as a mex and makes it into a sumti representing that mex itself (as opposed to {li .abu}, which is a sumti representing the value of "a"), as described in http://dag.github.com/cll/18/19/
So the literal meaning would be
> "a" is the beautiful [mex]
But http://dag.github.com/cll/17/10/ mentions that this will be interpreted as
> "a" is the beautiful [letteral]
, as a special case.
".abu", on the other hand, is not a letteral at all, but is a word. (Okay, it IS also the letteral, referenced by lerfu-string "denpa bu.abuby.ubu"). You can say ".abu is a beautiful [word]" quoting it with, for instance, {zo}.