>>1813
>>1815
>>1819
The "anything related to" copy is indeed weird. I suspect it's mainly there to block the narrow mindset people get into when they hear that Lojban is "logical" or "unambiguous". Lojban itself doesn't put any restrictions on what is in the domain of discourse or how it translates to the real world, so there is no problem with using {lo} and ordinary predicates for, say, characters in stories. And IMO saying {lo cribe} can't be bear goo makes no sense. Isn't tense unspecified by default?