Can "cu" be used more than once like this:mi sepi'o da cu broda gi'e seka'a de cu brode
Can "cu" be used more than once like this:
mi sepi'o da cu broda gi'e seka'a de cu brode
No, after "gi'e" the selbri must follow directly, no intervening terms.But with "ge" it is possible:mi ge sepi'o da cu broda gi seka'a de cu brode
No, after "gi'e" the selbri must follow directly, no intervening terms.
But with "ge" it is possible:
mi ge sepi'o da cu broda gi seka'a de cu brode
>>498No intervening terms; does that include sumtcita? Is "... gi'e seka'a de brode" also ungrammatical?
>>498
No intervening terms; does that include sumtcita? Is "... gi'e seka'a de brode" also ungrammatical?
>>500 Yes.All the terms preceding the first selbri are shared by the two connected sebri, so if the second selbri was allowed to have its own preceding terms, that would break the symmetry of the connective, because the first selbri couldn't have its own terms in such position. <shared-terms> <selbri-1> <terms-1> gi'e <selbri-2> <terms-2> vau <shared-terms>
>>500
Yes.
All the terms preceding the first selbri are shared by the two connected sebri, so if the second selbri was allowed to have its own preceding terms, that would break the symmetry of the connective, because the first selbri couldn't have its own terms in such position.
<shared-terms> <selbri-1> <terms-1> gi'e <selbri-2> <terms-2> vau <shared-terms>
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -