xu do sisku lo lojbo tcana
  [Home] [Manage]

Posts and uploaded files are owned by the poster. jbotcan.org is not liable for the content submitted by the poster. Downloading any poster-submitted files is doing so at your own risk.

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Painter: Width: Height: Source:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
Link
Subject (encouraged)
Comment
File
Password (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
No.998  
>> .i [...] lo nu stodi manfo xabju lo lanzu zdani cu rinka lo nu ca'o lo masti be li re lo nu gy menli stati cu binxo lo xalsa

"xalsa"?

>> .i va'o lo nu lo nilce cu fanta lo nu gy fenki cpare fi lo cunso cu na to'e prali gi'e ja'a ja'e prali

Can "ja'e", which is a BAI, come right before <selbri-2>? Maybe "prali ja'e" i.e. <selbri-2> <term-2>?

>> .i lo mamta cu zi binxo lo smaji gi'e sidju lo mensi se kai lo ka tsali mulno kei lo nu lebna lo se dacru

Is "lo ka tsali mulno" better than "lo ka tsali culno" in this context?

>> .i la .gregor. [...] cu zi to'e setca lo stedu lo cnita be lo sfofa te zu'e lo nu jdice lo du'u ta'i ma kau gy kakne lo nu zukte pagbu lo cuntu se kai lo ka prije je racli traji cumki

"zukte pagbu"? Maybe "zukte pagre"?

>> .i ku'i .u'u lo mamta cu pa moi lo xruti [...]

The gimste says that the x2 of "moi" is a set.

>> .i ba bo my xruti lo ka kansa la .greten.

Maybe "fi lo ka kansa la .greten."?

>> .i ku'i gy ba zi randa jinvi lo du'u lo nu lo ninmu cu so'i roi klama da de gi'e ze'i krixa gi'e gasnu lo nu sakli fa lo nilce lo loldi cu rinka lo nu gy ganse lo barda kalsa noi banro to'o ro da

There are two "da". Are they referring to the same thing?

>> .i py bargu renro lo mapku noi bu'u ke'a cu ba'o se jivbu lo solji skari sinxa be la'a lo banxa ku'o lo cpana be lo sfofa pa'o lo kumfa

I think "se jivbu" should be "jivbu".

>> .i lo jipno be lo kosta cu trixe

What is "lo jipno be lo kosta"?

>> ni'o lo patfu cu pu gasnu lo nu culno fa lo daski lo grute noi se krasi lo grute vasru poi cpana lo lamji jubme

What if "tisna" is used instead of "culno"? What would be the difference?

>> No.1000  

>>998

>"xalsa"?

"kalsa", fixed!

> Can "ja'e", which is a BAI, come right before <selbri-2>?

Yes, like all tags, BAIs can come right before the selbri.

> Maybe "prali ja'e" i.e. <selbri-2> <term-2>?

That would also be grammatical (with an elided "ku" in this case).

> Is "lo ka tsali mulno" better than "lo ka tsali culno" in this context?

It's something like "with all her strength", so I guess it has more to do with totality/completeness than with fullness

> "zukte pagbu"? Maybe "zukte pagre"?

The idea is "participate", "take part", "be an active part in the matter".

> The gimste says that the x2 of "moi" is a set.

Yes, but I don't use sets. They never seem to add anything useful, and they can sometimes complicate things unnecessarily.

>> .i ba bo my xruti lo ka kansa la .greten.
> Maybe "fi lo ka kansa la .greten."?

That's actually on purpose. I think agentless xruti is much more useful than agent-xruti, which I can always recover as "xrugau".

If you must, you can always interpret it as "she returned the property of being with Greten (to herself)".

>> .i ku'i gy ba zi randa jinvi lo du'u lo nu lo ninmu cu so'i roi klama da de gi'e ze'i krixa gi'e gasnu lo nu sakli fa lo nilce lo loldi cu rinka lo nu gy ganse lo barda kalsa noi banro to'o ro da
> There are two "da". Are they referring to the same thing?

No, since the second "da" is quantified with "ro", it has to be a new variable. For two or more "da" to be the same variable, only the first one can have a quantifier. (In other words, a variable can only be bound by one quantifier at a time.)

> I think "se jivbu" should be "jivbu".

Yes, fixed!

> What is "lo jipno be lo kosta"?

"the-tail ends of is jacket"

> What if "tisna" is used instead of "culno"? What would be the difference?

I guess it wouldn't make much difference in this case. In one case we focus on the filling process and in the other case on the final state.

>> No.1002  

>>1000

> Yes, like all tags, BAIs can come right before the selbri.

Doesn't the position before selbri have to be secured for sharedterms? That's what I thought was the case in:

[shared-terms] selbri_1 [terms_1] /VAU/ gi'e selbri_2 [terms_2] /VAU/ [shared-terms] /VAU/

> No, since the second "da" is quantified with "ro", it has to be a new variable. For two or more "da" to be the same variable, only the first one can have a quantifier. (In other words, a variable can only be bound by one quantifier at a time.)

How about this:

da po'u lo mi gerku zo'u ge pa da blabi gi re da bunre to ro da barda toi

Are the second and last "da" to be considered different from "da po'u lo mi gerku"?

>> No.1003  

>>1002

> Doesn't the position before selbri have to be secured for sharedterms? That's what I thought was the case in:
> [shared-terms] selbri_1 [terms_1] /VAU/ gi'e selbri_2 [terms_2] /VAU/ [shared-terms] /VAU/

The tag is part of the selbri, so it is not shared with another selbri. (The same thing happens with NA.) For it to be shared, it needs to become a term, which is done with "ku".

> How about this:
> da po'u lo mi gerku zo'u ge pa da blabi gi re da bunre to ro da barda toi
> Are the second and last "da" to be considered different from "da po'u lo mi gerku"?

In that case, I would take all of them to be restricted to "lo mi gerku", but that seems to be more a pragmatic thing than a general rule. In fact, even in:

lo mi gerku zo'u ge pa da blabi gi re da bunre to ro da barda toi

I would take "da" to be quantified over lo mi gerku in all cases. But each time it is bound by a different quantifier.


Delete Post []
Password